Enter any function into the field to display the function graph. A
moving point on the graph shows you the elasticity of the function at that
point.
An elasticity
indicates how strongly a variable reacts to the change of another variable. All
changes are indicated in %. As an example to illustrate this, we use the price elasticity of demand or the
substitution elasticity of a production function. The price elasticity of demand is the percentage change in demand for a one
percent change in price.
The substitution elasticity of a production function (with two factors of
production) is the percentage increase of one factor of production, which is
necessary to keep the produced quantity constant if the other factor of production
is decreased by one percent.
Although the elasticity is easy to understand in terms of content and
mathematically clearly defined, the implementation of the most important
economic examples (price elasticity of demand and substitution elasticity)
deviates from the standard representation. In the case of the elasticity of
substitution, not the original production function (since it is a function of two
variables) but its isoquant is used. In the case of the price elasticity of demand,
the sign is changed and the ordinate and abscissa are swapped. The presentation
of the price elasticity is shown in the next graphic.
Properties
The elasticity is scale invariant . Thus, it does not matter in which unit the input and output quantity is
measured. Since only percentage changes are included in the calculation
of the elasticity, the scale is not important. Example: 1 % of 100.000 € are 1.000 €. If you use T € as a scale, you
get 1% of 100T € are 1T €, which is the same.
The elasticity
of a function
is linked to the derivative, but is not the same! While the derivative of a
function relates the change of the output ()
to the change of the input (),
,
for the calculation of the elasticity one uses the relative changes(
and ),
thus, .
The relation between derivative and elasticity (the approximation by
means of
and
is identical for both) results thus in As a consequence, the elasticity of a linear demand is not constant, but
low for a low price and high for a high price. Rather, the elasticity is
the derivative on a double logarithmic scale (see below).
At a fixed point (x,p) the price elasticity of demand is higher the flatter
(!) the demand curve is. The demand elasticity measures the strengthAt
(c.p.) a higher price the demand elasticity is higher. At (c.p.) a higher quantity the demand elasticity is lower. Reason: The representation of demand as a function of price measures
absolute values!
Demand elasticity and revenue: case study
Here, we assume a linear or
concave demand function, which implies a decreasing marginal utility with a
non-increasing rate of purchase. This implies that the elasticity of demand
increases with the price. At the
maximum revenue is reached. Descriptive explanation: If starting from
the price is increased, then the quantity is reduced disproportionately, since with a higher
price,
applies. A price increase by 1 reduces the quantity by more than 1. Thus, the sales
revenue decreases. If starting from
the price is reduced, then the quantity increases under-proportionately, since with a
lower price,
applies. A price reduction by 1 increases the quantity by less than 1. Thus, the
sales revenue decreases. In both cases, the sales revenue decreases. If the variable costs are negligible (e.g. museum, cinemas), then sales revenue
maximization is equal to profit maximization and the enterprise behaves
optimally, if it tries to maximize the revenue.
The elasticity as double logarithmic derivative
If the demand curve or another
function is plotted in a coordinate system with two logarithmic axes, the
elasticity corresponds to the slope of the curve in this coordinate system. In
other words, the elasticity of a function is obtained by differentiating
the logarithm of the function with respect to the logarithm of the input
variables. In the derivation of the assertion, we use
and
Furthermore, it should be noted that extending this fraction by
is
formally not quite correct, but allows the reader an intuitively understandable and
comprehensible derivation. Derivation
(c) by Christian Bauer Prof. Dr. Christian Bauer Chair of monetary economics Trier University D-54296 Trier Tel.: +49 (0)651/201-2743 E-mail: Bauer@uni-trier.de URL: https://www.cbauer.de